|
 |
robonaut 3
Posted by: celshader
Video duration: 27 seconds
Telepresence based anthropomorphic machine developed by Nasa. Uses Motion capture to control a robot.
Related: astronaut, capture, engineering, mars, mechanical, moon, motion, nasa, robot, robotics, shuttle, space, telepresence
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
robonaut 2
Posted by: celshader
Video duration: 24 seconds
Telepresence based anthropomorphic machine developed by Nasa. Uses Motion capture to control a robot.
Related: astronaut, capture, engineering, mars, mechanical, moon, motion, nasa, robot, robotics, shuttle, space, telepresence
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
robonaut 1
Posted by: celshader
Video duration: 12 seconds
Telepresence based anthropomorphic machine developed by Nasa. Uses Motion capture to control a robot.
Related: astronaut, capture, engineering, mars, mechanical, moon, motion, nasa, robot, robotics, shuttle, space, telepresence
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
|
|
| Videos are copyright their respective owners
Latest comments made on this video:
By: andrelebaron. on 22 Nov 08, 22:31:19
it's really sad the way people cut and paste these clips. Ruby made a final statement from his hospital bed on December 19 that he and he alone had been responsible for the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald.[23] "There is nothing to hide," Ruby said. "There was no one else."
By: grassyknollkiller. on 21 Nov 08, 15:38:44
When LBJ admits to being party to assassinations in his own voice, I take him at his word. video ?v=DeNv_62v6WQ
By: mityway. on 16 Nov 08, 03:28:45
citizens of the world dont despair, the last 100 years of the secrect ones agenda will be finally released for the world to hear and see. due to the fact within the all the society groups there has been infiltraters gavering evidence.these people will come forward in due course.and god help all the companies,governments,etc who have brought misery to the masses.over the last century, revenge is near.
By: martynhanson. on 14 Nov 08, 20:17:50
Just because someone may have helped in the 'kill' it doesn't mean to say they knew it was going to happen. The idea that scores of people all knew it was going to happen is nonsense. The vast majority of them were probably told a 'story' or they changed their story. That Dallas official who pointed to the front of his head to inidicate to the press what killed JFK - he didn;'t know the story was a back of head entry! it was not that organised at that pont
By: grassyknollkiller. on 01 Oct 08, 04:15:23
Roger Craig, former DPD officer in TSBD when rifle was found "And he walked over to Fritz, and Capt. Fritz was holding the rifle up in the air. And I was standing next to Weisman, who was standing next to Fritz, and we wernt any more than 6 or 8 inches from the rifle, and stamped right on the barrel of the rifle was 7.65 Mauser. 3 cops at the same moment looking at the stamping on the barrel "7.65 Mauser". Oswald purchased a 6.5 mm caliber Carcano rifle. Oswald didnt shoot anyone.
By: grassyknollkiller. on 27 Sep 08, 23:41:52
A former CIA photoanalyst, Homer McMahon, in 1963 worked at the NPIC, a part of the CIA advanced photographic facility responsible for analyzing U2 spy plane photos. McMahon said an SS agent delivered an amateur 8mm film to NPIC in Nov 63, and he was never left alone with it and was not allowed to make copies; only give an analysis. His analysis was evidence of 6 to 8 shots fired at the JFK motorcade from at least 3 directions. McMahon says he viewed the film 10 or more times that evening.
By: grassyknollkiller. on 24 Sep 08, 02:18:06
Allen Dulles(CIA) and fellow Yale bonesman Henry Luce(owner of TIME magazine who purchased the Zapruder film) together launched psychological warfare programs in 1950's. Under the CCF, Dulles and Luce set National Security directives for the Truman White House, including PSBD-33/2, establishing the Psychological Strategy Board. This previous psychological warfare collusion makes it 100% certain the Z film was heavily edited to help cover the assassination members in high govt positions.
By: pajasa62. on 14 Sep 08, 23:54:02
Fine, what you say sounds reasonable, EXCEPT, I asked you initially 3 questions which you didn't answer, followed by my "replying constructively" in 3 posts, which you seemed to ignore....
By: jellysheep. on 14 Sep 08, 21:41:00
Relies don't annoy me. It's the way people flame people's opinions for the sheer joy of it, instead of replying constructively. By all means reply to something somebody posts, but in a nice, non-abrasive way, not accusing them of talking "crap".
By: pajasa62. on 14 Sep 08, 01:18:17
ooops! You can add the teams of doctors at Parkland Hospital and Bethesda to the list ( and while your at it, since Jackie turned down Walter Reed Medical on the flight on Air Force 1, any conspiracy would have had to have those doctors "in on it" as well!)
By: pajasa62. on 14 Sep 08, 00:56:30
LIST: Secret Service, FBI, RFK, Dallas police, Dallas DA & Bar, New Orleans/ Dallas media, national media, Warren Commission w/ staff lawyers/ researchers, handgun order-house, rifle order-house, post office, eye/ear witnesses in Dealey Plaza, bus/ cab driver, Oswald landlady, eye/ ear witnesses to Tippet slaying/ flight to theatre, Cuban/ Soviet Embassies in Mexico, Marina Oswald, the Paines, Wesley Frazier & sister, Ruby/ strippers/ Western Union employee...without them NO conspiracy coverup!
By: pajasa62. on 14 Sep 08, 00:55:39
Well, since you challenged me... Where do I get that 200+ from to pull off an "Oswald alone/ conspiracy coverup"? From the simple HISTORY of the event. My next post I'll give you a list of people ACTUALLY involved. NONE of it includes the MOTIVE to kill, the conspiracy theorists "teams of SHOOTERS" and the always overlooked, people to RECRUIT the individuals/ groups involved. Add those 3 above elements to the list... And if you're annoyed by someone replying, than don't bother posting.
By: jellysheep. on 13 Sep 08, 23:30:37
I also challenge you to find 200+ reasons to substantiate YOUR opinion on the whole thing. Then you'll see how silly your reply was. Why does it take a list of 200+ to make an opinion valid? Where did you pull that figure from? Do you set a personal quota before you can take anyone's opinions on board? 200+ is absurd. It was my opinion. I don't see why I should sit here & waste hours of my time to appease somebody I don't even know who can't be bothered to find stuff out for themselves.
By: pajasa62. on 13 Sep 08, 02:59:21
So tell us, who were the "genuine people who worked hard on the investigation"? Got any examples of "red herrings and decoys" or "witnesses intimidated", etc? Do you have a number of conspirators that it took to keep the Oswald alone/ conspiracy coverup?...When you hit the 200+ number, then forget this conspiratorial crap your pitching.
By: brojulien. on 10 Sep 08, 16:39:30
When I visted Dallas, I made one important observation. There were way too many investigators involved. Dallas a was a small town at the time, ('63) today, it's a large and modern city. The Dallas Sherrif's Dept. and the Dallas Police were not equipped to handle the assassination. In Canada and Great Britain, the RCMP and /or Scotland Yard are not under control of political and or government organizations, at least not like the FBI was under the control of J.E. Hoover and company.
By: jellysheep. on 09 Sep 08, 23:57:40
I agree. Any law enforcement agency would have solved it in no time at all. But the whole investigation was hindered by the planting of red herrings and decoys... as arranged by outside agencies and the powers that be. I feel sorry for the genuine people who worked hard on the investigation. They must have felt like they were hitting a brick wall half the time. Evidence going missing... witnesses intimidated... killed, etc...
By: theshadowrules. on 27 Aug 08, 04:34:48
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police would have solved that crime in 30 days!! As would Scotland Yard!!
By: grassyknollkiller. on 26 Aug 08, 01:45:58
Kenneth O'Donnell, SS, Follow-up Car, WC deposition,May 18, 1964,7H448 1964 KO:"My reaction in part is reconstruction - is the shots came from the right rear." MAN of the HOUSE, by Tip O'Neill, Random House:1987, pg178 1987 KO:"I told the FBI I heard two shots from behind the fence but they said it couldn't have happened that way and that I must have been imagining things. So I testified the way they wanted me to. I just didn't want to stir up any more pain and trouble for the family."
By: grassyknollkiller. on 26 Aug 08, 01:43:33
Dept of State,S/S-NSC Files:Lot 72 D 316,NSAMs. Top Secret;Eyes Only. Memorandum of Discussion at the Special Meeting on Vietnam, Honolulu,November 20, 1963 "The Generals appear to be united and determined to step up the war effort." On October 11, 1963, JFK signed NSAM 263, signed the first withdrawal of 16,000 Americans "advisors" from Vietnam. Who is really in charge of govt on Nov 20, 1963? This memo makes the JFK presidency irrelevant on Nov 20, 1963. Time for a murder for change.
By: messi502. on 26 Aug 08, 01:00:36
so what does that mean exactly? i'm sorry, its just that this stuff is so interseting i'm unable to think straight.
By: grassyknollkiller. on 24 Aug 08, 16:53:11
And there it is. Memorandum of Discussion at the Special Meeting on Vietnam, Honolulu, November 20, 1963. This meeting is ONLY 2 days before they assassinated JFK. JFK was going to announce pulling out of Vietnam after the next election. He made enemies of the mafia, the military/industrial complex, CIA, Justice Dept, the politically corrupt members; including VP and State Dept. and Cuban Nationals. He had to go.
By: grassyknollkiller. on 24 Aug 08, 16:52:18
Dept of State,S/S-NSC Files:Lot 72 D 316,NSAMs. Top Secret;Eyes Only. Memorandum of Discussion at the Special Meeting on Vietnam, Honolulu,November 20, 1963 "Ambassador Lodge described the outlook for the immediate future of Vietnam as hopeful. The Generals appear to be united and determined to step up the war effort. They profess to be keenly aware that the struggle with the Viet Cong is not only a military problem, but is also political and psychological. They attach great importance..."
By: bradcdm. on 23 Aug 08, 22:29:27
You conspiracy nuts are crazy oswald shot kennedy on his own but you guys cant believe that a nobody can take down the most powerful man in the world that is your problem and nothing more to it you have to some how balance the scales to give oswald more weight.
By: daverudynski. on 23 Aug 08, 18:18:49
Ruby killed Oswald to shut him up. If no one didn't take out Oswald, Oswald would of told the truth. The reason why no one didn't kill Ruby, because the Mafia was Controling the goverment and the dallas police. and they knew in time Ruby was not going to live that long.
By: PatR915. on 23 Aug 08, 07:17:48
Real Jewish name: Jacob Rubenstein