hahaha,americans ... By: andreyRUS17. on 30 Nov 08, 11:53:19 hahaha,americans solders use russian weapon
They will take ... By: gat0rbball. on 11 Nov 08, 02:22:08 They will take small arms fire, AK47s and on up to the bigger LMG rounds(7.62 x 51mm). Its when you get up to the .50 that they have special rounds designed to fire high velocity incendiary rounds. Those however are expensive and about out of reach of the haji we are usually attacking. And im sure .50 cal guns are hard to come by on the black market. Plus try shooting that without getting spotted lol. You were partially right. I wasnt specific enough though.
Well, alright, you ... By: sbald82nd. on 11 Nov 08, 02:10:02 Well, alright, you got me. I was going on an assumption about the treads. I would've thought that they would be designed to be at least resistant to small arms, if not completely shielded, but I guess I was wrong.
Lol M1's treads ... By: gat0rbball. on 11 Nov 08, 02:06:27 Lol M1's treads being rubber(if im not mistaken) would not be resistant to bullets for long. If you are firing proper .50 cal bullets im sure you can eventually take out the treads, its a matter of practicallity though. How long are you willing to sit and shoot at an Abrams? Lol i wouldnt wanna take more than 1 shot cause then u get blasted. RPGs and such could do the trick, but also gotta think about the driver. If you disable the vision you disable the tank. That is an old trick snipers learnd
he's paid to fight, ... By: sbald82nd. on 10 Nov 08, 23:19:07 he's paid to fight, and therefore that is his profession. rpg's don't have a large amount of recoil.
I don't think that ... By: sbald82nd. on 10 Nov 08, 23:11:51 I don't think that was a thermobaric warhed. correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't those only used in air-dropped bombs? i don't think a self-propelled rocket has any potential to do significant damage with a thermobaric explosion, as the projectile is small, but please correct me if you are sure i am wrong.
there was an abrams ... By: sbald82nd. on 10 Nov 08, 23:09:22 there was an abrams in iraq reportedly taking 50 rpgs and it still functioned properly. danyil23 is right. however, i am pretty sure that the treads, at least on the m1a1 & a2, are resistant to small arms fire, including .50 BMG. also, i may be wrong, but if you know of our current AT4 rocket launcher, i believe that is capable of disabling an abrams with one hit, and a javelin can most certainly disable near any tank as long as the missile functions properly.
with ease By: DjJFocus. on 10 Nov 08, 07:45:06 with ease
looks kinda like he ... By: weeman306. on 18 Oct 08, 05:53:24 looks kinda like he got scope eye
Your right. You can ... By: gat0rbball. on 16 Jul 08, 22:44:44 Your right. You can take out the treads. The same can work with a .50. They have been doing that since the dawn of tanks. Cripple its movement and you make it useless. There are other ways to disable, but im not gonna talk about that.
This guy is a ... By: gu3st8. on 11 Jul 08, 13:12:11 This guy is a professional.
devia explodir sua ... By: jcp1980. on 09 Jun 08, 21:14:35 devia explodir sua cabeça.
BUT: this takes the ... By: danyil23. on 09 May 08, 04:37:36 BUT: this takes the m1a1's FIRST armor plate..melted metal expands in the air between the two sides of the double armor,and inner armor merely have a scratch..This "onion type"XD armored,modern tanks(UK,French,German modrn tanks also)cannot be taken by cumulative type rockets,only by those BIIG fckn monsters, designed to take out double armored tanks(doesnt know the technology)but you can disable an abrams many ways with an RPG7,but CANNOT penetrate its armor,even with bigger cumulative rockets.
T-64 is WAAAAAY old ... By: danyil23. on 09 May 08, 04:33:15 T-64 is WAAAAAY old... But: you can take out an abrams by the top.. As any tanks. But about the other sides armor: old M1a1 was designed to have double armor, and it has air between it..Cumulative rocket hits the first, pre-detonation tears a small hole, and the melted,hot metal from the warhead sprays inside, taking care of remaining centimeters of armor, and its heat, and gas, and remaining spray kills anybody inside..
ure wrong By: RATM4LIF3. on 04 May 08, 00:18:24 ure wrong
GO AUSSIES By: sugarcatpaw. on 28 Feb 08, 14:58:52 GO AUSSIES
I dont know what ... By: pillotalk. on 24 Feb 08, 01:02:57 I dont know what they use or dont use where, but the title says the video was taken in Afghanistan.
How about the RPG- ... By: overmind2. on 23 Feb 08, 05:49:44 How about the RPG-29? Because the RPG-29 is designed to tear tanks and heavily armour vehicles apart.
Actually your wrong ... By: DaChamp1989. on 22 Jan 08, 19:02:16 Actually your wrong murder302. The Abrams tank armor was built strong enough to take hits from 3-4 missle or tank shells from other tanks. The only way to destroy an Abram is though the bottom or behind the turret. Both cases are unlikely. The Abram tanks are some of the best tanks on the battlefield. Not a lot of tanks in the world could match up to it.
that looked like an ... By: spetsnaz5. on 21 Jan 08, 07:56:09 that looked like an TBG-7V thermobaric warhead. I didn't know they used those in Iraq.
RPG-7 is not death ... By: oldwhtguy. on 14 Jan 08, 01:38:35 RPG-7 is not death for a Abrams.You CAN disable a Abrams by wrecking a track But you won't penetrate the hull and kill the crew or detonate the ammo unless you score a kill on the ammo compartment behind the turret.Then the blast panels will blow out.
RPG-7 is the death ... By: Murder302. on 13 Dec 07, 21:20:38 RPG-7 is the death for the tank.
it is kills Abrams and T-64 if they are not protected with additional armor
to be honest I ... By: locsphere. on 11 Aug 07, 05:42:57 to be honest I don't remember I know we had to screw the propellant on the back of the RPG I know we recieved a lot of different types during a raid. Some of the RPG's had such sensative fuses they had to be blown in place the one's okayed by E.O.D we used for training.
My dad has a video ... By: ZombiesRPeoplesToo. on 19 May 07, 12:16:25 My dad has a video of this, one guy fires but the round doesnt fire, so he throws it on the ground because it could blow up in the chamber
| Videos are copyright their respective owners
Latest comments made on this video:
By: andreyRUS17. on 30 Nov 08, 11:53:19
hahaha,americans solders use russian weapon
By: gat0rbball. on 11 Nov 08, 02:22:08
They will take small arms fire, AK47s and on up to the bigger LMG rounds(7.62 x 51mm). Its when you get up to the .50 that they have special rounds designed to fire high velocity incendiary rounds. Those however are expensive and about out of reach of the haji we are usually attacking. And im sure .50 cal guns are hard to come by on the black market. Plus try shooting that without getting spotted lol. You were partially right. I wasnt specific enough though.
By: sbald82nd. on 11 Nov 08, 02:10:02
Well, alright, you got me. I was going on an assumption about the treads. I would've thought that they would be designed to be at least resistant to small arms, if not completely shielded, but I guess I was wrong.
By: gat0rbball. on 11 Nov 08, 02:06:27
Lol M1's treads being rubber(if im not mistaken) would not be resistant to bullets for long. If you are firing proper .50 cal bullets im sure you can eventually take out the treads, its a matter of practicallity though. How long are you willing to sit and shoot at an Abrams? Lol i wouldnt wanna take more than 1 shot cause then u get blasted. RPGs and such could do the trick, but also gotta think about the driver. If you disable the vision you disable the tank. That is an old trick snipers learnd
By: sbald82nd. on 10 Nov 08, 23:19:07
he's paid to fight, and therefore that is his profession. rpg's don't have a large amount of recoil.
By: sbald82nd. on 10 Nov 08, 23:11:51
I don't think that was a thermobaric warhed. correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't those only used in air-dropped bombs? i don't think a self-propelled rocket has any potential to do significant damage with a thermobaric explosion, as the projectile is small, but please correct me if you are sure i am wrong.
By: sbald82nd. on 10 Nov 08, 23:09:22
there was an abrams in iraq reportedly taking 50 rpgs and it still functioned properly. danyil23 is right. however, i am pretty sure that the treads, at least on the m1a1 & a2, are resistant to small arms fire, including .50 BMG. also, i may be wrong, but if you know of our current AT4 rocket launcher, i believe that is capable of disabling an abrams with one hit, and a javelin can most certainly disable near any tank as long as the missile functions properly.
By: DjJFocus. on 10 Nov 08, 07:45:06
with ease
By: weeman306. on 18 Oct 08, 05:53:24
looks kinda like he got scope eye
By: EZEEEIR. on 02 Sep 08, 22:21:49
maybe =D
By: gat0rbball. on 16 Jul 08, 22:44:44
Your right. You can take out the treads. The same can work with a .50. They have been doing that since the dawn of tanks. Cripple its movement and you make it useless. There are other ways to disable, but im not gonna talk about that.
By: gu3st8. on 11 Jul 08, 13:12:11
This guy is a professional.
By: jcp1980. on 09 Jun 08, 21:14:35
devia explodir sua cabeça.
By: danyil23. on 09 May 08, 04:37:36
BUT: this takes the m1a1's FIRST armor plate..melted metal expands in the air between the two sides of the double armor,and inner armor merely have a scratch..This "onion type"XD armored,modern tanks(UK,French,German modrn tanks also)cannot be taken by cumulative type rockets,only by those BIIG fckn monsters, designed to take out double armored tanks(doesnt know the technology)but you can disable an abrams many ways with an RPG7,but CANNOT penetrate its armor,even with bigger cumulative rockets.
By: danyil23. on 09 May 08, 04:33:15
T-64 is WAAAAAY old... But: you can take out an abrams by the top.. As any tanks. But about the other sides armor: old M1a1 was designed to have double armor, and it has air between it..Cumulative rocket hits the first, pre-detonation tears a small hole, and the melted,hot metal from the warhead sprays inside, taking care of remaining centimeters of armor, and its heat, and gas, and remaining spray kills anybody inside..
By: RATM4LIF3. on 04 May 08, 00:18:24
ure wrong
By: sugarcatpaw. on 28 Feb 08, 14:58:52
GO AUSSIES
By: pillotalk. on 24 Feb 08, 01:02:57
I dont know what they use or dont use where, but the title says the video was taken in Afghanistan.
By: overmind2. on 23 Feb 08, 05:49:44
How about the RPG-29? Because the RPG-29 is designed to tear tanks and heavily armour vehicles apart.
By: DaChamp1989. on 22 Jan 08, 19:02:16
Actually your wrong murder302. The Abrams tank armor was built strong enough to take hits from 3-4 missle or tank shells from other tanks. The only way to destroy an Abram is though the bottom or behind the turret. Both cases are unlikely. The Abram tanks are some of the best tanks on the battlefield. Not a lot of tanks in the world could match up to it.
By: spetsnaz5. on 21 Jan 08, 07:56:09
that looked like an TBG-7V thermobaric warhead. I didn't know they used those in Iraq.
By: oldwhtguy. on 14 Jan 08, 01:38:35
RPG-7 is not death for a Abrams.You CAN disable a Abrams by wrecking a track But you won't penetrate the hull and kill the crew or detonate the ammo unless you score a kill on the ammo compartment behind the turret.Then the blast panels will blow out.
By: Murder302. on 13 Dec 07, 21:20:38
RPG-7 is the death for the tank. it is kills Abrams and T-64 if they are not protected with additional armor
By: locsphere. on 11 Aug 07, 05:42:57
to be honest I don't remember I know we had to screw the propellant on the back of the RPG I know we recieved a lot of different types during a raid. Some of the RPG's had such sensative fuses they had to be blown in place the one's okayed by E.O.D we used for training.
By: ZombiesRPeoplesToo. on 19 May 07, 12:16:25
My dad has a video of this, one guy fires but the round doesnt fire, so he throws it on the ground because it could blow up in the chamber